Same moment. Two columns. You decide.

She Said / The Record Says

Pending the official transcript

Testimony at the October 22, 2026 hearing (pending the official transcript).

The sworn line is oversized. The filed text sits beside it. The sticker names the comparison. Read both. Then decide.

Comparison 1

Testimony compared with SOS filing and April 1, 2025 email

She said

“Yes, sir.”

Testimony at the October 22, 2026 hearing (pending the official transcript).

Timestamp 1:27:32-1:27:39

CONTRADICTION

The record says

Notice 118 Ex. A / Counterclaim Ex. 1 — Texas SOS Certificate of Amendment, Apr 1, 2025 (Doc. 1465837290002)
“Member: JONATHAN GARCIA”
See the exhibit
Notice 118 Ex. F / Counterclaim Ex. 6 — Filfil email, Apr 1, 2025, 2:33 PM CDT
“Please have your buyer Jonathan sign this asap.”
See the exhibit

You decide

Asked: “Did you not tell this court that I was put on [Damac] Investments as a glitch and that that was never your intention, though?”

Put the sworn line next to the filed words. The sticker is the comparison. The documents are the record.

Send this comparison.

Comparison 2

Testimony compared with signed contract amendment

She said

“Your signature is an agent. ... No, it doesn't.”

Testimony at the October 22, 2026 hearing (pending the official transcript).

Timestamp 0:49:48-0:49:58

CONTRADICTION

The record says

Notice 118 Ex. E / Counterclaim Ex. 5 — Commercial Contract Amendment (TXR-1932), effective Mar 28, 2025
“Buyer: “Damac Investments &/or Assigns,” signed by Jonathan Garcia”
See the exhibit

You decide

Asked whose signature appears under Damac Investments on the contract amendment, and whether the document says “agent” anywhere.

Put the sworn line next to the filed words. The sticker is the comparison. The documents are the record.

Send this comparison.

Comparison 3

Testimony compared with Nov 25, 2025 email

She said

“just an agent”

Testimony at the October 22, 2026 hearing (pending the official transcript).

Timestamp 1:23:19-1:23:24

CONTRADICTION

The record says

Counterclaim Ex. 7 (filing 33), as quoted in Ex. 66-E — Filfil email to the project team, Nov 25, 2025
“Jon Garcia, is my partner in this project.”
Counterclaim Ex. 17 — text, Aug 30, 2023 (Export p. 835)
“Official life time business partners”
See the exhibit

You decide

Asked why Garcia was brought into Damac Investments LLC.

Put the sworn line next to the filed words. The sticker is the comparison. The documents are the record.

Send this comparison.

Comparison 4

Testimony compared with seller's message

She said

“I was the buyer. ... I'm not a broker.”

Testimony at the October 22, 2026 hearing (pending the official transcript).

Timestamp 1:20:08-1:20:42

CONTRADICTION

The record says

Application Exhibit L (filing 106) — Ashok Reddy iMessage to Garcia, Apr 8, 2025
“our Broker, Sophia Filfil ... As the Seller, we authorize her to work with you on our behalf.”
See the exhibit
A page image of this exhibit is not in the gallery. Filing 106 is posted.

You decide

Asked her business role in the Damac transaction.

Put the sworn line next to the filed words. The sticker is the comparison. The documents are the record.

Send this comparison.

Comparison 5

Testimony on authorization (consistent with documents)

She said

“Yes, it is.”

Testimony at the October 22, 2026 hearing (pending the official transcript).

Timestamp 0:46:10-0:46:48 (repeated at 0:46:48; Court: “She said yes.”)

LINES UP

The record says

Notice 118 Ex. F / Counterclaim Ex. 6
“Please have your buyer Jonathan sign this asap.”
See the exhibit

You decide

Asked whether on April 1, 2025 she instructed and authorized Garcia to sign on behalf of Damac Investments LLC.

Put the sworn line next to the filed words. The sticker is the comparison. The documents are the record.

Included because Garcia contends this differs from her October 8 testimony; the Oct 8 statement itself is available only as characterized in Garcia's post-hearing brief (filing 86), not verbatim.

Send this comparison.